Skip to content

Every claim. Checked against every source.

What it flags
  • Churn restated
  • Different basis
  • Hedged answer
  • One source only
  • Wrong expert
  • Customer concentration

A live copilot for expert calls and diligence meetings. It reads the CIM, the QoE and every earlier call, and shows live which claims are corroborated, disputed or resting on one source. No bot, no recording.

Book a 15-minute demo

The problem

Documents on one side. Calls on the other.

Today one person checks one against the other by hand or from transcripts, a call at a time. What the sources disagree on turns up late.

Illustration: documents (the CIM, the QoE, the management deck and a data room extract) move along one belt and calls (expert, management and reference) along the other, while one person checks across them by hand or from transcripts.

What makes it different

Every tool tells you what was said, afterwards. Corrobly tells you, while the expert is still on the line, that what was said conflicts with page 7 of the CIM or with what management said last week, and hands you the question.

The screen during a call

Expert call: RoofStack

Expert A, ex-VP Sales at a competing roofing-SaaS vendor

8:00

Your notes

  1. 4:00competition: roofstack wins on measurement integrations, loses to TopCoat on price. win rate against them was 55/45 roofstack in bakeoffs
  2. 5:20churn: roofstack gross churn ~9% enterprise, ~20% smb, his own churn was 12% blended. numbers from a shared win/loss consultant both firms used
  3. 6:40churn triggers: 80% of smb churn is contractor going out of business, not product. enterprise churn almost always a failed onboarding
  4. 7:50onboarding: 6 weeks with a dedicated CSM, he thinks roofstack cannot scale past ~80 onboardings/quarter without partners

Guide coverage

  • Addressable marketPartial
  • Spreadsheet shareAnswered
  • Win and lossAnswered
  • Churn by segmentAnswered
  • Churn triggersAnswered
  • Onboarding scalePartial

Covered

6 of 6

Grace window

7:00

Disputed: Gross churnCIM 8% blended; this call 9% enterprise, 20% SMB

KeepFirsthand, recent, sourced numbers

  1. 1Your notes, typed as you go. The transcript runs alongside when you turn it on.
  2. 2The guide fills itself from what is said, question by question.
  3. 3Whether to keep the expert or end the call early, while they are still on the line, with the claim the sources dispute.

What you get

  • Live in the call

    The guide fills itself from what is said. A wrong expert is flagged inside the network's window.

  • Ready when you hang up

    Call note, takeaways, since-last-call and next-call brief, every line naming its source.

  • One evidence set per deal

    Every document and every call, claim by claim, so the dispute on churn shows in week one, not at IC.

Works the same on management meetings, advisor calls and reference calls.

The arithmetic

What weak calls cost a deal.

A weak expert ended inside the grace window is a fee you do not pay. Put in your own numbers.

15%

Experts who turn out not to have the exposure you paid for.

60%

Weak calls ended before the network's grace window closes.

Estimated fees avoided per deal

£2,880

6 weak calls per deal, 3.6 caught before the fee is due.

Compliance

  1. No bot joins the call.
  2. No second recording.
  3. Audio is never stored.
  4. Stored in London.
  5. No training on your data.
  6. No public links.
  7. Retention your firm sets.
  8. Audit log.
  9. Transcript import for firms that do not allow tools on the line.
Read the security page

Try it on your next deal.

Book a 15-minute demo
Corrobly: every claim, checked against every source